Dune: Part Two

Warning ! This postal service turn back spoilers for Dune : Part Two .

Summary

Dune 2 ’s events make it heavy not to believe that Paul Atreides is a villain , but Dune 3 will likely prove that there is more complexness to his characterization than see the eye . Denis Villeneuve ’s moviesare not the first to conform Frank Herbert ’s novels . In the past , a 1984 David Lynch motion-picture show and a 2000 TV series attempted to traverse theDunebooks to the live - natural action storytelling medium . However , none of the previous adaptations worked because they failed to depict one crucial expression of Paul Atreides ' journey .

While Frank Herbert always wanted Paul ’s tale inDuneto be interpreted as a monitory story about the danger of unchecked power , the David Lynch moving picture and the miniseries break to entrance the author ’s vision and portray Paul as a Italian sandwich . The serial briefly bring up what Paul ’s actions would finally lead to but , unfortunately , did not follow up on the plot of ground screw thread . As seen inDune 2 , Denis Villeneuve ’s film series accurately charm the essence of how the source intended to portray Paul as a baddie . However , there is still another layer to Paul ’s characterisation thatDune 3will uncover .

Dune : Part Two cemented Paul ’s role as the primary villain of Dune , but this was really teased long before the character ’s true transformation .

01644435_poster_w780.jpg

Paul Doesn’t Just Want Power In Dune

Paul has virtuous motives in Dune

Denis Villeneuve ’s firstDunemovie only dedicate a glimpse of how Frank Herbert care to portray Paul and leaders like him . While it is hard not to assume that Paul is the hero of the story almost throughoutDune ’s runtime , his visions of the future foreground how his ascent would at long last lead to a world-wide jihad . Dune : Part Twodelves even deeper into theLisan al Gaib prophecy , explain how , despite being aware of how his activity will in the end chair to universal genocide , Paulchooses to comprehend his destiny in a way that defy the very whim of valiancy .

Every time he sees visions of the jihad his actions could make , he finds himself in a moral dilemma where he can not assist but question whether the goal ever justify the way .

However , even thoughDune : Part Twoaffirms that Paul is not a hero , it does not inevitably confirm he is a baddie . As seen in the film , Paul ’s decision to embrace his portion is not labour by his lust for power . rather , every time he sees visions of the jehad his actions could cause , he finds himself in a moral quandary where he can not help oneself but question whether the ends ever justify the means . Unlike most typical villains , Paul has highly virtuous motives , but his situation and destiny at last make him both a Redeemer and the cause of mass destruction .

Timothee Chalamet as Paul in Dune 2

Custom Image by Debanjana Chowdhury.

Paul Is Motivated By Helping Humanity And Keeping Chani Alive

Paul thinks he is choosing the lesser evil

By embracing the Lisan al Gaib prognostication , Paul finds himself in a moral paradox where his actions avenge the execution of his loved ones , save mankind , and keep Chani safe , but , at the same prison term , they also lead to the death of billions of people . With one foot in the terrible consequence of heeding the call of his destiny and the other securely planted in following his moral range , Paul ’s determination ultimately becomes a delicate balance between two iniquity . Ultimately , he does what he comprehend to be the great good , lead him to trigger off the holy warfare towards the end ofDune 2 .

Chani ’s decision to leave at the end of Dune : Part Two was shrouded in mystery story , and it has monumental implications for the futurity of the story .

Dune Messiah Proves Paul Is An Antihero, Not A True Villain

One Dune: Part Two scene foreshadows how Chani’s perception of Paul may change

InDune : Part Two ’s endingmoments , it becomes evident that the film ’s perspective is shifting from Paul ’s point of view to Chani ’s . This change in position high spot how Chani is the motion-picture show serial ' fresh main Cuban sandwich , while Paul is the charismatic leader Frank Herbert warned against . While this seemingly paints a shameful - and - white picture show of how Chani is now on the good side while Paul is on the malign end of the spectrum , Dune Messiahwill rise that Paul ’s narration is more complex , and he is more of an anti - hero .

After Paul toast the Water of Life inDune 2 , he state Jessica that Chani will eventually sympathize what he is doing . SinceDune 2significantly changes Chani ’s storyfrom the original book , one can only suppose what Paul is try out to imply . However , theDune : Part Twoscene suggests that Chani will ultimately see eye - to - centre with Paul inDune Messiah , agnise that as destructive as his actions might have seemed , they were driven by a sense of necessary . With this , Dune Messiahwill , in many ways , demoralise howDune 2portrays Paul by obscure the lines between heroism and villainy .

Your Rating

Your scuttlebutt has not been saved

Cast

Dune : Part Two remain the epical saga of Paul Atreides as he ally with Chani and the Fremen . pursue payback for his family ’s ravaging , Paul grapples with a significant conclusion impacting his personal desire and the universe ’s future , attempting to avert a dire destiny that only he anticipates .

1Cast-of-Dune-Part-Two

Custom image by Brennan Klein

Chani (Zendaya) with a horrified look on her face set against a fiery red and orange background in Dune: Part Two

TImothee Chalamet as Paul Atreides in Dune Part Two

Custom image by Brennan Klein

Headshot Of Timothée Chalamet

Headshot Of Zendaya In The Los Angeles Premiere Of Amazon MGM Studios' ‘Challengers’

Dune: Part Two