Related
Summary
Oscar - winning directorAng Leevoices his notion on 3D filmmaking . Lee is an Oscar - winning director behind films such asLife of Pi , Crouching Tiger , Hidden Dragon , andBrokeback Mountain . He has won two Oscar for Best Director — include forBrokeback MountainandLife of Pi — and has been nominated for Best Picture three times .
PerIndieWire , Lee speaks out regarding the use of 3D in filmmaking . The managing director made a generalised statement about the consumption of 3D call it “ so unsound . ” He said that the “ filmmakers are tough ” who make these 3D films , and the dramaturgy are “ meagre ” and “ dim ” and do not support the technological penury that 3D could have . withal , he has feel “ pressure ” in the past to create 3D pic , including “ economic pressures ” and “ studio pressures . ” learn out the full quotation from Lee below :
I tried higher skeletal frame rate and I essay 3D. I tried raw mode of make movies . Those picture are really sharp-worded . That ’s a lot of pressure . Everything is difficult , so that is always a great pressure . I can not get into detail on how to make those movies . People have not tried even one moment of that scale . I did two feature films . That ’s cracking pressure level . Of naturally , that brought in economic pressing , studio press , doing something nobody really knows . That ’s a quite a little of pressure . It ’s quite complicated [ in ways ] that hearing do n’t see .
In general , not only my two moving-picture show , 3D in general … [ is ] so unfit . The movie maker are tough . The dramatic art are bad . The whole ecosystem is bad . It ’s not made for [ 3D ] . I reject to complain , to charge it on the sensitive … it ’s the hearing , and the industriousness , [ who ] were not prepared .
The theaters are stingy . It ’s really vague , you ca n’t really see it . It ’s flickering , and the 3D. People do a short job , [ it ] gives you a vexation , it ’s purely bad . You ca n’t pick the audience for not liking it because it ’s bad . And they ’re enquire to pay more money . When it gets secure , citizenry like it . It ’s simple . 3-D is dissimilar than 2D. Your mind works otherwise . you may not compare the two . One is sophisticated and the other is like a baby . That ’s why I recrudesce new projectors . It ’s four times brighter . It ’s a new speech a filmmaker has to pick up , interview has to get used to it , it just aim metre .
Is Ang Lee Right About 3D?
Is 3D Right For Some Movies?
What Lee gets spot on is the fact that 3D is overused by an industry looking for just the ticket sales over strong narration pick .
Lee ’s non - spirit of Pi3D career highlights a problem with 21st - century 3-D , part of which Lee covers in his argument . This issuance is an effort by studios to make 3-D omnipresent , using it for copious whole kit and caboodle wherein 3D does not make a mickle of sense . Because , as Lee pronounce simply “ three-D is different than 2D,”not all stories guarantee being vomit in three dimensions . Billy Lynn ’s Long Halftime Walkis a great instance of this , for it is a warfare drama whose dramatization need not be base on the spectacle of objective protruding from the screen .
That said , there are films for which 3D ply a huge benefit . A absolved example would be James Cameron’sAvatarfranchise , whose stunning water force are made even more wizard in the3D sequelAvatar : The Way of Water . The immersive quality of the world of Pandora — from the earth to the visuals themselves — is part of what gives theAvatarfranchise its appeal , therefore making the 3D nature of the picture show workplace .
So , Leeis partially right in his statement about the role of 3D on screenland . The director perhaps come down too intemperately on the side of 3-D being bad , though he does check that to “ not blame the medium . ” What he get down spot on is the fact that three-D is overuse by an industry looking for ticket sales over strong narrative choices .
Source : IndieWire
